Why Men Rule A theory of male dominance
de Goldberg, Steven.
Éditeur: Chicago, La Salle (Ill.) : Open Court, 1993.Description: xiv-254 p., append., index.ISBN: 0-8126-9236-5.N° Inventaire: , L12855.Thématique: Différenciation sexuelle | Domination masculine | PatriarcatThématique spécifique: Stéréotype | Amazone | Rôle social | Identité sexuelle | Femme | Psychophysiologie | Déterminisme culturel | Rôle masculin | Homme | Hermaphrodisme | Quotient intellectuel | Socialisation | Déterminisme biologique | Physiologie | Inégalité sexuelle | Rôle sexuel | Matriarcat | CognitionEthnique: Iroquois | Pygmées MbutiAuteur cité: Engels, Friedrich | Green (P.)Résumé: Part I : The Inevitability of PatriarchyRésumé: A Question and Some Ground RulesRésumé: Anthropology and the Limits of Social VariationRésumé: Differentiation of Dominance TendencyRésumé: Physiological DifferentiationRésumé: Social Conformation to Psychophysiological RealityRésumé: Part II : Objections and ImplicationsRésumé: The Inadequacy of a Non-Physiological ExplanationRésumé: Confusion and Fallacy in the Environmentalist AnalysisRésumé: Common Objections to the Theory of Male DominanceRésumé: Part III : Cognitive DifferentiationRésumé: Possible Sexual Differentiation in Cognitive AptitudesRésumé: High Genius in the Arts and SciencesRésumé: Part IV : The Meaning of Male and FemaleRésumé: Male and FemaleRésumé: Alleged Exceptions to the Universality of Patriarchy and Male DominanceRésumé: TLS, 1/7/94, p. 5, M. Ridley Item type:
Ouvrage
| Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Éric-de-Dampierre | GN 481.1 G616 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | GN 481.1 G616 | ||
| Éric-de-Dampierre | Available | L12855 |
Rev. ed. of "The Inevitability of Patriarchy", 1977.
bibliogr.
Part I : The Inevitability of Patriarchy
A Question and Some Ground Rules
Anthropology and the Limits of Social Variation
Differentiation of Dominance Tendency
Physiological Differentiation
Social Conformation to Psychophysiological Reality
Part II : Objections and Implications
The Inadequacy of a Non-Physiological Explanation
Confusion and Fallacy in the Environmentalist Analysis
Common Objections to the Theory of Male Dominance
Part III : Cognitive Differentiation
Possible Sexual Differentiation in Cognitive Aptitudes
High Genius in the Arts and Sciences
Part IV : The Meaning of Male and Female
Male and Female
Alleged Exceptions to the Universality of Patriarchy and Male Dominance
TLS, 1/7/94, p. 5, M. Ridley
There are no comments on this title.
